🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand local authorities will be slashed by more than half, following a controversial law change that required local governments to submit the future of hard-won Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include multiple councillors depending on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by first submitting it to a community referendum in their region. Communities frequently spent years generating community backing and pushing their local governments to create Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration allowed municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating local residents should decide whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The new legislation required councils that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – revealing many regions against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in reinstating local democratic control.”

Critics nevertheless have criticised the new policy as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the coalition government has ushered in extensive reversals to policies designed to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has stated it wants to terminate “race-based” policies, and says it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – most cities mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

The recent municipal polls registered the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with less than a third of eligible voters casting a vote, prompting demands for reform.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are permitted to establish different electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation indicated the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement referred to the 17 areas that voted to keep their wards.