🔗 Share this article

Imagine this: a happy the Danish striker wearing Napoli's colors. Next, place that with a dejected Benjamin Sesko sporting United's jersey, looking as if he just missed a sitter. Don't bother finding an actual photo of him missing; background information is your adversary. Now, include statistics in a large, comical font. Remember the emojis. Share it everywhere.

Would you point out that Højlund's tally features strikes in the Champions League while Sesko isn't playing in continental tournaments? Certainly not. And will you note that four of the Dane's goals came against Belarus and Greece, or that Denmark is much stronger to Slovenia and generates many more chances. If you manage online for a large outlet, raw engagement is what pays the bills, Manchester United are the prime target, and nuance is the thing to avoid.

Thus the cycle of content turns. Your next task is to scan a lengthy podcast featuring Peter Schmeichel and find the part where he describes the acquisition of Sesko "strange". There's a bit, where he qualifies his remarks by saying, "I have nothing bad to say about Benjamin Sesko"... yes, cut that. Nobody needs that. Just ensure "weird" and "the player" are paired in the headline. People will be furious.

The Season of Potential and Hasty Opinions

The heart of fall has traditionally one of my preferred times to watch football. Leaves fall, winds shift, squads and strategies are still fresh, all is novel and yet everything is beginning to form. Key players of the season ahead are planting their flags. The summer market is closed. Nobody is talking about the quadruple yet. Everyone are still in the game. Right now, anything is possible.

However, for many of the same reasons, this period has long been one of my least favourite times to consume news on football. Because although nothing has yet been settled, something must always be getting settled. Jack Grealish is reborn. The German talent has been a major letdown. Is Antoine Semenyo the top performer in the league at this moment? Please an answer immediately.

The Player as Patient Zero

In many ways, Benjamin Sesko feels like the archetype in this context, a player caught between football's opposing, non-negotiable forces. The need to withhold definitive judgment, allowing technical development and strategic understanding to mature. And the imperative to produce permanent definitive judgment, a conveyor belt of opinions and jokes, context-free condemnations and pointless comparisons, a puzzle that can not truly be circled.

I do not propose to provide a in-depth analysis of Sesko's time at Manchester United to date. The guy has started four times in the top flight in a wildly inconsistent team, scored two goals, and had a grand total of 116 touches. What precisely are we evaluating? And do I propose to duplicate Gary Neville's and Ian Wright's notable debate "The Sesko Debate", in which two famous analysts duel passionately on a podcast over whether he needs 10 goals to be deemed successful this season (Neville), or whether it is more like twelve or thirteen (the other).

A Cruel Environment

Despite this I enjoyed watching Sesko at Leipzig: a powerful, screeching racing car of a striker, playing in a team pitched perfectly to his abilities: given the freedom to attack but also the freedom to fail. And in part this is why United feels like the most unforgiving place he could possibly be right now: a place where "brutal verdicts" are handed down in roughly the duration it takes to watch a pre-roll ad, the club with the widest and most ruthless gulf between the time and air he requires, and the time and air he is likely to receive.

We saw an example of this over the international break, when a widely shared infographic handily informed us that the player had been judged – by a wide margin – the poorest acquisition of the summer transfer window by a poll of 20 agents. Naturally, the media are not alone in such behavior. Team social media, online personalities, anonymous X accounts with a oddly high number of fake followers: all parties with skin in the game is now basically aligned along the same principles, an environment deliberately geared for controversy.

The Psychological Toll

Endless scrolling and tapping. What are we doing to us? Are we aware, on any level, what this endless sluice of aggravation is doing to our brains? Separate from the inherent strangeness of playing in the middle of it all, knowing on some surreal butterfly-effect level that every single thing about players is now basically content, commodity, public property to be repackaged and exchanged.

Indeed, partly this is because it's Manchester United, the corpse that keeps nourishing the cycle, a big club that must always be producing the strong emotions. But also, partly this is a temporary malaise, a swing of judgment most visibly and cruelly glimpsed at this time of year, about a month after the window has closed. Throughout the summer we have been desiring players, praising them, drooling over them. Yet, just a few weeks in, many of those same players are now being disdained as failures. Should we start to worry about Jamie Gittens? Was Arsenal's purchase of their striker wise? What was the purpose of Randal Kolo Muani?

A Wider Issue

It seems fitting that he faces their rivals on the weekend: a team at once 13 months unbeaten at home in the Premier League and yet in their own state of feverish crisis, like submitting a missing person’s report on a person who popped to the shops half an hour ago. Defensively suspect. Mohamed Salah finished. The striker waste of money. Arne Slot bald.

Maybe we have not yet quite grasped the way the narrative of football has started to replace football the actual game, to influence the way we watch it, an whole competition reoriented around talking points and reaction, something that occurs in the background while we scroll through our devices, unable to detach from the constant flow of opinions and further hot takes. Perhaps this player taking the hit at present. However, we're all sacrificing a part of the experience in this process.